Farnham's Freehold by Robert A. HeinleinMy rating: 2 of 5 stars
There are few Heinleins that I can say I actively dislike. Indeed, even the most questionable is usually filled with interesting characters and great premises and that can-do attitude.
This one has ASPECTS of all that, and while the PREMISE of a whole racial slavery hierarchy being flipped on its head sounds GOOD on the surface, this one just comes off icky on every beat.
Which is very sad. I want to forgive it a lot of its faults. But reading it through today's lens, it's pretty indefensible.
Hugh is an asshole. A bully. Just because he did something decent, his power plays were just as ugly as any slave master in the past or (in this case) the future. White supremacy logic, but without the humor of a horror novel that flips all the horror on the person who might have perpetuated it.
The takeaways of whomever gets a taste of power will automatically defend the use of it, no matter what happens, may or may not be realistic, but how it is portrayed in this novel is almost cartoonish.
The fact that Hugh tries to pull the old hero role to escape the slavers with his girl is probably the only decent part of this novel, but by then, I'm not rooting for any of these people anyway.
So, why do I really dislike it? It's the assumptions. The assumption that previous slaves will easily take to being slavers, that a taste of comfort is more than enough to seduce someone despite the very worst practices.
I don't deny that anyone, of any race or socioeconomic status can be an asshole. But sweeping generalities really stink. Especially when they're this ham-fisted. I'll also not deny that this would not be that bad a novel IN ITS TIME. It is very critical of all these people and racism in general, in the story, itself. Hitting the mid 60's, it's timely, too.
But it's NOT a Planet of the Apes novel, no matter how close it seems to come.
View all my reviews





